Connecticut Will Pay a Security Analyst 150K To Monitor Election Memes

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Popular Science: Ahead of the upcoming midterm elections, Connecticut is hiring a “security analyst” tasked with monitoring and addressing online misinformation. The New York Times first reported this new position, saying the job description will include spending time on “fringe sites like 4chan, far-right social networks like Gettr and Rumble and mainstream social media sites.” The goal is to identify election-related rumors and attempt to mitigate the damage they might cause by flagging them to platforms that have misinformation policies and promoting educational content that can counter those false narratives.

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont’s midterm budget (PDF), approved in early May, set aside more than $6 million to make improvements to the state’s election system. That includes $4 million to upgrade the infrastructure used for voter registration and election management and $2 million for a “public information campaign” that will provide information on how to vote. The full-time security analyst role is recommended to receive $150,000. “Over the last few election cycles, malicious foreign actors have demonstrated the motivation and capability to significantly disrupt election activities, thus undermining public confidence in the fairness and accuracy of election results,” the budget stated, as an explanation for the funding.

While the role is a first for Connecticut, the NYT noted that it’s part of a growing nationwide trend. Colorado, for example, has a Rapid Response Election Security Cyber Unit tasked with monitoring online misinformation, as well as identifying “cyber-attacks, foreign interference, and disinformation campaigns.” Originally created in anticipation of the 2020 presidential election, which proved to be fruitful ground for misinformation, the NYT says the unit is being “redeployed” this year. Other states, including Arizona, California, Idaho, and Oregon, are similarly funding election information initiatives in an attempt to counter misinformation, provide educational information, or do both.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

In Private, Vulnerable Senate Dems Back Off Tech Bill

A bipartisan legislative effort to rein in the nation’s largest tech companies is facing fresh resistance from a faction of Senate Democrats over complaints the measure could threaten their chances of holding their slim majority, 10 people familiar with the matter told POLITICO. From a report: The internal opposition comes as Democratic leaders are pushing for a vote on the bill by summer, in an effort to pass what has become a central element of the party’s broader antitrust agenda. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act, S. 2992 (117) — led by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) — would ban major tech firms like Amazon and Google from favoring their products over their competitors. For example, the legislation would bar Amazon from promoting its own private-label products over rival items on its e-commerce platform. The bill marks the most serious attempt at tightening oversight of the tech industry in years and passed the Senate Judiciary Committee with support from both parties earlier this year. Yet in the days since Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told Klobuchar he would hold a floor vote as early as next month, several Democratic senators have privately expressed deep reservations about voting for the legislation, particularly with a midterm election looming, in their conversations with Schumer and other Democratic offices.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Facebook Opens Political Ad Data Vaults To Researchers

Meta’s ad transparency tools will soon reveal another treasure trove of data: advertiser targeting choices for political, election-related, and social issue spots. The Register reports: Meta said it plans to add the targeting data into its Facebook Open Research and Transparency (FORT) environment for academic researchers at the end of May. The move comes a day after Meta’s reputation as a bad data custodian resurfaced with news of a lawsuit filed in Washington DC against CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Yesterday’s filing alleges Zuckerberg built a company culture of mishandling data, leading directly to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The suit seeks to hold Zuckerberg responsible for the incident, which saw millions of users’ data harvested and used to influence the 2020 US presidential election.

Jeff King, Meta’s VP of business integrity, said that FORT would allow researchers to look at detailed targeting information for social issue, electoral and political ads. “This data will be provided for each individual ad and will include information like the interest categories chosen by advertisers,” King said. Prior to this announcement, data for social, electoral, and political ads in the run-up to the 2020 election was available as part of a pilot program. This new release will expand the pilot and add data from all ads in those categories run globally since 2020, King said.

The non-academic public has to wait until July to get their hands on that data in Facebook’s Ad Library, and when released it will be in a summarized form. Included in the update will be data on total number of social, electoral, and political ads ran on a page using particular targeting data, percentage spent on the different issues, and whether the page uses a custom or lookalike audience. King said that Meta hopes the release will “help people better understand the practices used to reach potential voters on our technologies,” and emphasized yet again that Meta is “committed to providing meaningful transparency, while also protecting people’s privacy.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Is Insider Trading ‘Common’ in NFTs? (And is It Really Insider Trading?)

What happened after U.S. prosecutors indicted an NFT marketplace’s product manager for insider trading? Vice reports:

The reaction among crypto investors was largely characterized by surprise, and an acknowledgement that trading on insider information (considered by some to be A-OK in private markets) is rampant in the space. “Bro they are prosecuting insider trading on NFTs. we’re all fucked,” said one pseudonymous user in reply to a tweet about the case by Steven Zheng, director of research at The Block. “This is pretty shocking. I can’t imagine any NFT or DeFi developer doesn’t somehow profit from insider trading,” said another.

Of course, not every NFT investor sees this kind of activity as acceptable. Traders themselves first brought Chastain’s activity to light in September using blockchain records. A pseudonymous NFT trader, who goes by Zuwu, pointed out those trades, which were easily traceable to Chastain’s publicly-known Etheruem address.

Unlike Chastain, other NFT traders involved in potential insider trades are often too careful to leave traces. When they do, blockchain sleuths are quick to uncover those signs of unsavory behavior and call them out — a recent phenomenon that attempts to bring some justice to an otherwise permissive market.

As a result, that surprise move by the U.S. Department of Justice has NFT traders wondering what’s on the horizon for this largely unregulated industry. “Insider trading is a pretty common problem in the NFT space, especially in the case of hyped-up NFT collections as lots of stuff on the market is being driven by FOMO,” Fedor Linnik, an NFT trader and creator, told Motherboard.
The article also explores the question of whether the NFT marketplace falls under same restrictions as stock trading, with a professor of securities law calling it “somewhat misleading” to label this an “insider trading” case.

Even to call it a wire fraud case is a stretch, the professor tells them, adding “If it goes to a jury they will wonder why they should care whether someone traded jpegs ahead of them being moved around on a webpage.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Microsoft Tries Collaborating with Unions to Avoid ‘Public Disputes’

“Microsoft on Thursday announced a new strategy for dealing with organized labor…” reports the Washington Post (in a story republished on MSN.com):

In a blog post shared with The Washington Post, Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote that the company will respect workers’ rights to unionize and plans to work collaboratively with organized labor organizations to “make it simpler rather than more difficult” for employees to unionize if they so choose.

Microsoft is in the process of completing a $69 billion acquisition of Activision, a video game company where employees of a small subsidiary voted to unionize in March. That union, the Game Workers Alliance, is a division of the Communications Workers of America (CWA), which in a statement called Microsoft’s announcement “encouraging and unique among the major tech companies.” CWA Secretary-Treasurer Sara Steffens added that “to truly give workers a legally protected voice in decisions that affect them and their families, these principles must be put into action and incorporated into Microsoft’s day-to-day operations and its expectations for its contractors….”
Rebecca Givan, a Rutgers University professor of labor relations, said Microsoft’s announcement could mean the company is trying to smooth things over with employees interested in unionizing. “There’s a lot of actual organizing or talk or desire in the video game sector, and that’s a piece of what Microsoft does. That might be what they’re trying to get out in front of,” Givan said.

The article argues that Microsoft is “attempting to set itself apart from other Big Tech firms like Google and Amazon that have clashed publicly with employees seeking union representation.” And it provides specific examples where other big tech companies have “gotten into trouble” with America’s National Labor Relations Board:
“The labor board has repeatedly found that Amazon wrongfully terminated or retaliated against workers who were involved with union organizing.”
“Google, too, has had to settle charges with workers who said the company fired them in response to union organizing.”
“Workers at Apple told The Post in April that they were targeted by management for supporting the union and threatened with the loss of certain benefits and opportunities for promotion.”

The president of America’s largest federation of union, the AFL-CIO, tells the Post in a statement that “Microsoft’s collaborative approach to working with its employees who seek to organize is a best practice that we look forward to seeing implemented at Microsoft and other companies.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Companies Are Having Trouble Enforcing Return-to-Office Policies

NPR reports:
Just last month [Apple] decided to postpone its plan after more than 1,000 current and former employees signed an open letter called the plan inefficient, inflexible and a waste of time. “Stop treating us like school kids who need to be told when to be where and what homework to do,” they wrote. It was yet more evidence of the shift in the balance of power between management and rank and file, as demand for workers has hit record highs in the past year.

Companies are finding it hard to enforce unpopular policies and mandates when they fear their workers could just walk away…. Google maps workers, who are employed by the tech company Cognizant, also decided to fight back. They connected with the Alphabet Workers Union and signed a petition citing COVID fears, the costs of commuting amid $5 gas, and the increase in productivity and morale that employees have experienced while working from home…. “Our first day back to the Bothell office full-time will now be September 6,” the company said in a statement released on Thursday.

Even as some companies seek to bring back some semblance of office life, others are asking: What is the office for anyway?

In an iconic moment, NPR’s reporter also visited a management consulting firm, where their new human resources worker (who started in May) admits that “It’s hard to even fathom going into the office 100%. I don’t think I could do it ever again.”

Saturday the New York Times also reported that some corporate leaders “might find themselves fighting a culture shift beyond their control…. [Non-paywalled version here]

“If the pandemic’s two-plus years of remote work experimentation have taught us anything, it’s that many people can be productive outside the office, and quite a few are happier doing so.”
Even as the pandemic has changed course, there are signs that the work-from-home trend is actually accelerating. One recent survey published in the National Bureau of Economic Research found that employers are now saying they will allow employees to work from home an average of 2.3 days per week, up from 1.5 days in the summer of 2020.

It’s not just the office — it’s also the commute. The Wall Street Journal reported this week that almost all of the major cities with the biggest drops in office occupancy during the pandemic had an average one-way commute of more than 30 minutes; and most cities with the smallest drops had shorter commutes.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

GNOME Shell is Being Ported to Phones

“As part of the design process for what ended up becoming GNOME 40 the design team worked on a number of experimental concepts,” reports a blog post at Gnome.org’s shell-dev blog, “a few of which were aimed at better support for tablets and other smaller devices.”

“Ever since then, some of us have been thinking about what it would take to fully port GNOME Shell to a phone form factor.”
It’s an intriguing question because post-GNOME 40, there’s not that much missing for GNOME Shell to work on phones, even if not perfectly…. On top of that, many of the things we’re currently working towards for desktop are also relevant for mobile, including quick settings, the notifications redesign, and an improved on-screen keyboard. Given all of this synergy, we felt this is a great moment to actually give mobile GNOME Shell a try. Thanks to the Prototype Fund, a grant program supporting public interest software by the German Ministry of Education (BMBF), we’ve been working on mobile support for GNOME Shell for the past few months.

We’re not expecting to complete every aspect of making GNOME Shell a daily driveable phone shell as part of this grant project. That would be a much larger effort because it would mean tackling things like calls on the lock screen, PIN code unlock, emergency calls, a flashlight quick toggle, and other small quality-of-life features. However, we think the basics of navigating the shell, launching apps, searching, using the on-screen keyboard, etc. are doable in the context of this project, at least at a prototype stage.

Of course, making a detailed roadmap for this kind of effort is hard and we will keep adjusting it as things progress and become more concrete… There’s a lot of work ahead, but going forward progress will be faster and more visible because it will be work on the actual UI, rather than on internal APIs. Now that some of the basics are in place we’re also excited to do more testing and development on actual phone hardware, which is especially important for tweaking things like the on-screen keyboard.

Their blog post includes a video showing “what this currently looks like on laptops” and then one showing it running “on actual phone hardware.” And someone has also posted a video on Twitter showing it running on a OnePlus 6 smartphone.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Ask Slashdot: Why Haven’t They Increased Size Limits for Email Attachments?

“Email system are quite capable of sending and receiving large attachments,” writes long-term Slashdot reader Stonefish “However, size limits are generally tiny.”

And then he tells a story…

In the late 1990s I worked for a research organisation maintaining their mail system, and had recently introduced mail size constraints. Within the first day it had blocked a number of emails — including a 700MB attachment.

Being a master of all thing Internet I called up the sender to tell him how firstly how such a large email would cause problems for the receiver, and secondly how there were far more efficient ways of sending things. Given that he was on the same campus he invited me down to his lab to discuss this further. (After showing me round his lab, which was pretty impressive apart from the large “Biohazard” and “Radioactive” materials labels on the doors.) He told me that the facility he was sending the attachments to was a supercomputing hub with similar “Fat” pipes to the Internet so the large emails weren’t a problem. I then spoke about the “efficiency” of the mail protocol and he said that he’d show me what efficient was and did a quick, “drag, drop and send” of another 700MB file of his latest research results.

He was right, I was wrong, it was efficient from his perspective and all his previous emails were easily available demonstrating when and where they were sent. As a result of this we changed our architecture and bought bulk cheap storage for email as it was a cheap, searchable and business focused approach to communications.

However 20 years plus later, even though networks are tens of thousands of times faster and storage is tens of thousands of times cheaper — email size limits remain about the same. Email remains cheap, efficient and ubiquitous — but we expect people to upload a file to a site and generate a link and embed in a manner that means we lose control of our data or it disappears in 12 months.

What’s missing from this analysis? (Wikipedia’s page on email attachments notes the intermediate “mail transfer agents” that store and forward email “and may therefore also impose size limits.”) But even that page admits some attachment limits are arbitrary.

I always assumed it was an anti-piracy measure. Anyone know the real answer? Share your own thoughts in the comments.
Why haven’t they increased size limits for email attachments?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Leaked Google Pixel 7 Reportedly Listed on eBay, Sold on Facebook Marketplace

Earlier this week an alleged prototype of Google’s upcoming Pixel 7 smartphone was reportedly listed for sale on eBay, the Verge reported. (“The distinctive camera bar is back, and this year it’s an aluminum bar with cutouts for the cameras…” they wrote, adding “We’ve collected images from the eBay listing into the gallery below, if you want to scrutinize them for yourself.”)

But now a Reddit user is claiming they actually bought Google’s as-yet-unreleased Pixel 7 Pro smartphone on Facebook Marketplace — and then used it for three weeks without realizing it. (Because the seller had listed it as a Pixel 6 Pro without a box.)

From the Verge’s new report today:
Google pre-announced the Pixel 7 and 7 Pro at its I/O keynote last month, revealing what the devices will look like and… not much else. They’ll very likely make their formal debut in October with Android 13. These alleged prototypes haven’t shed much more light on what we can expect from the phones, either — just confirmation that it’s using a different modem than the Pixel 6 series and that it appears to come in a variant with 256GB of storage and 12GB of RAM.

There probably won’t be much more we can learn from it, either. The purchaser of the alleged prototype said that the phone had been functioning fine until a few days ago when it seems to have been remotely wiped.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Someone Leaked Classified Chinese Tank Schematics To Win an Online Argument

schwit1 shares a report from Task & Purpose: A fan of the popular mechanized combat simulator ‘War Thunder’ shared the specs of China’s Type 99 Main Battle Tank online in order to win an argument over the game. […] The latest incident, first reported by the OSINTtechnical Twitter account, involves information in Mandarin on the penetrator section of a Chinese tank round along with a technical diagram. While many of the original images have been taken down, they were essentially the schematics for a Chinese tank munition, presumably revealed to the world so a video game could more accurately depict what would happen if a Chinese tank and an American tank — or British, French, Russian, German or Israeli tank — met in combat. And this isn’t the first time these forums have become an outlet for technical leaks. […]

The most recent leak, the latest leak, from someone with access to the latest technical manuals from China’s People’s Liberation Army, occurred because a user wanted the game’s Chinese battle tanks to have better in-game stats. While most of the information about the Chinese tank round was already known, it was still apparently more important for one gamer to prove another gamer wrong on a message board than it was to consider the implications of publishing the technical details of military munitions online.

The video game developer, Gaijin Entertainment, banned the user, telling Kotaku that, “Our community managers immediately banned the user and deleted his post, as the information on this particular shell is still classified in China. Publishing classified information on any vehicle of any nation at War Thunder forums is clearly prohibited, and the game developers never use it in their work.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.